Tag Archives: Kansas City Royals

We Won’t Get Fooled Again

0
Filed under Kansas City Chiefs, Kansas City Royals

That has to be the best Who song of all time.  But, that isn’t what I am writing about.  I am writing in order to take a stand for all the Royals fans out there.  I know that you are not defenseless, and probably don’t need my help, but what the hell. 

The Royals look good right now.  After Friday night’s clobbering of the White Sox, they are now 60-87, threatening to climb out of the cellar, 9-2 in their last 11, and have had double digit hits in 6 straight games and 11 of the last 12.  Luke Hochevar looked solid, Zack is Zack, Robinson Tejeda should win the Cy Young Award next season.  And the you see comments like these:

“It seems like every year, that last month, they play their best baseball against teams trying to win the division.  They have a good young team over there.” – Mark Buehrle

Shit!  That will inevitably lead to this comment about March of 2010:

“We weren’t very far off last year.  Look at the way we finished.  That is what we expected all year.  Injuries killed us.  Hopefully that won’t happen again.  We just needed a couple of pieces to be a contender.  That’s why we added former Braves reliever Vladimir Nunez for the next 4 years at $6 million per year.  We’re excited for the season.”

Don’t let Dayton pull the wool over your eyes.  Playing well for the first 29 games and the last 20 games does not mean we get to forget about the other 113 in between.  Now that I have said my peace, here are Logg’s NFL picks for week 2:

Chiefs (-3) over Raiders – Cassel finally makes his debut, and I am not fooled by the “new and improved Raiders”.  Plus, can you really pick against Bobby Wade?

Tennessee (-6.5) over Houston – The Texans have no defense, and thus will yet again have no playoff spot.

New England (-3.5) over NY Jets – Mark Sanchez gets a little dose of reality against a real team.  He’s still my favorite Mexican American quarterback.

Green Bay (-9) over Cincinnati – My god, and I thought Chiefs fans were tortured.  The Bengals are the most pathetic franchise in pro sports…ever.

Detroit (+9.5) over Minnesota – I will never pick the Vikings.  Matt Stafford gets his first win this week.

New Orleans (pk) over Philadelphia – McNabb is out, Westbrook is always hurt, and Brees is unstoppable.

Atlanta (-6) over Carolina – Is Delhomme still the quarterback of the Panthers?  Really?  Really?

St. Louis (+9.5) over Washington – I am guaranteeing the Rams score points this week.

Jacksonville (-3) over Arizona – for the sake of my fantasy teams, please give the ball to Beanie Wells and make me look like a genius.

San Francisco (-1.5) over Seattle – Niners make the playoffs just to spite Crabtree.

Buffalo (-5) over Tampa Bay – I said it last week, and I’ll say it this week; Tampa is bad.

Cleveland (+3) over Denver – The luck runs out this week, Broncos fans.

Baltimore (+3.5) over San Diego – Was Baltimore’s offense as good as last week or was the Chiefs’ defense just that bad?  I say both.

Pittsburgh (-2.5) over Chicago – Cutler blows again. 

NY Giants (+2.5) over Dallas – I am watching this game just for the punts.  Come on scoreboard!!!

Indianapolis (-3) over Miami – Put the house on this one…

Enjoy the games!!!  Go Chiefs!!!!

Last week: 7-9

Season: 7-9

Poking Holes In A Classic

3
Filed under Non-Sports

No Royals game = No Royals loss. 

 

And I suppose that’s a good thing.  What’s not a good thing?  Having nothing to watch on television.  I mean, there was Big Brother of course, which was entertaining, but that’s about it.  (You’re effed, by the way, Ronnie). 

 

On most nights during this spring and summer I have had a pretty standard routine after work.  I come home, eat dinner, watch TV until about 10:00 or so, and then finally watch the Royals game that I have recorded.  I do this for a couple of reasons.  1. My girlfriend and I like to watch “our shows” during prime time.  Plus, despite being a baseball fan and a good sport, I know for a fact she doesn’t want to watch the blundering Royals.  2. This way I can fast forward through the commercials.  I mean, how many times can I watch an old man get hit in the head with a can of Keystone Light*?  There is only one commercial that I will stop the fast forwarding and watch, and that is the GEICO commercial where the cavemen are bowling to Three Doors Down’s “Let Me Be Myself”.   Classic.

 

*All I can think about when I see Keystone light commercials is “Key-Stone Me!”   This was a slogan we came up with in college.  When we would have big parties at the fraternity house, we would buy a lot of beer from a distributor.  We always got whatever they would sell us the cheapest.  One time is was Keystone, hence “Key-Stone Me!” or “Get Key-Stoned!”.   Other times it was Milwaukee’s Best.  But the ultimate was when we got Stroh’s.  You have no idea how many times I said the words “Stroh’s before hos”.  Ah, the reflections of a misspent youth.

 

Last night I was exhausted.  I came home, ate dinner, and immediately got in bed and fell asleep.  Sounds good right?  I mean, no Royals game; might as well get caught up on some rest, right?  Poor choice.  I woke up around 10, and was wide awake.  No chance I am going to fall asleep.  So I descended to the couch for a little bit.  Nothing on TV except for one of the greatest movies of all time…ready?  I’ll give you a hint:

 

The Navy calls it Fighter Weapons School.   The drivers call it…

 

TOP GUN

I love this movie.  End of story.  But, I have a few problems with it.  And since I don’t feel like writing about the Royals, Big Ben Rapelisberger, Lance Armstrong, or Michael Vick, this is what I am going with.

 

Problem 1: What happened to Cougar when he “turned in his wings”?

 

I mean, aren’t you locked into service for some amount of time?  Was he right at the point of re-upping?  You can’t just turn in your notice to the Navy after they have spent all the time and money training you to fly planes.  In Top Gun II – Sundown’s Revenge, the movie opens with Cougar explaining that he was quitting his new assignment of unclogging the latrines because he was ‘holding on too tight, and lost the plunger’.

 

Problem 2: How, if Top Gun training only lasts for 5 weeks, is it only for the top 1% of Naval Aviators?

 

How many pilots are there?  If they push 20 pilots through top Gun every 8 weeks, wouldn’t they churn through 1% in about 3 sessions?  I suppose they couldn’t disclose that because it wouldn’t sound nearly as prestigious as “You represent the top 84% of all Naval aviators.  The mediocre.  The best of the rest.”

 

Problem 3: If Jester is so awesome, why does he bail for the hard deck as soon as he is in trouble?

 

This should have been examined a little closer in the movie.  I think Maverick has a pretty good argument in Viper’s office.  As soon as the game turns against him, Jester is saying “I am taking my plane and going home”.  Pussy.

 

Problem 4:  Where did Sundown come from?

 

Is he an alternate or something?  Do they just have RIO’s sitting standby in Miramar waiting to see if someone dies?  God forbid you just let the pilot grieve.  It’s a five week course.  Goose dies, they collect all evidence, have a hearing, and then get him back in the plane in two days???  You know Sundown was just sitting on the tarmac before every hop eyeballing the RIO’s that were going up.  That has to be freaky.  It’s like training your replacement before you even get fired.

 

Problem 5: If there is a crisis halfway around the world, why do you have to summon for pilots at Top Gun?

 

There has to be more pilots around somewhere.  A ship is disabled, and drifting into enemy waters, and you are telling the captain of that ship that we should be there to help in 36 hours?  I can imagine that conversation:

 

Admiral: We’re on our way.

Captain: Okay, do you have an ETA

Admiral: Next Tuesday.

Captain: Um, why is this taking so long?

Admiral: We need pilots.

Captain: (downing another scotch) You have a whole aircraft carrier.  Don’t you have any pilots?

Admiral:  Yeah, but you don’t want these pilots.  They are in the bottom 99%.

Captain: (refilling the glass) Oh, well, you’re the boss I guess.  We’ll be floating here whenever you’re ready.

 

Problem 6: Did Hollywood feel like a Douche getting off the helicopter after the dogfight?

 

The look on his face as he jogs into the celebration on deck is one of uneasiness.  I mean, he lasted all of 30 seconds in the fight.  It would be like Conor Teahan getting carried off the court after KU won the National Championship.  Awkward.

 

Final Problem: Did “Charlie” take the promotion in Washington or not?

 

She’s there in the diner when Maverick finally returns.  That must have been months.  I mean, by the time Maverick is debriefed, gets his orders changed, moves to San Diego, and is working at Top Gun, don’t you think she would be long gone?  This one gets answered in the sequel.  Maverick hooks up with a grieving Meg Ryan.  Charlie sees them making out in the bar, and is furious.  She looks for revenge, and decides that the best thing she can do is screw Sundown.  Maverick decides he doesn’t want to take care of Goose’s kid, and bails on Meg.  He goes to Charlie’s house only to find Sundown banging his ex-girlfriend.  Charlie doesn’t see Maverick, but Sundown does.  Sundown looks dead at Maverick and says, “You could have had it man!  You could have had THIS man!”

 

The end. 

 

Now, back to Royals baseball.  Is it football season yet?

The Royals Rebate

2
Filed under Kansas City Royals

It’s 11:00pm in the Midwest, I have finally started watching the second half of the Royals-Angels double header (sorry, but at this point, when I have to make a “prime time” television decision, I choose Big Brother and the premier of Hell’s Kitchen), and I am paying bills.   I like paying bills because, well, I am a banker by trade.    I like numbers.  It’s what I am good at.  I am not good at tracking baseballs hit directly at me with a broken bat, and neither is Alberto Callaspo based on what I saw in the 1st inning.    So, as I am paying my punch in the gut cable bill, I was wondering just one thing…

Based on the purchase price of the MLB Extra Innings package, what am I really getting for my* hard earned money.  I mean, we all know the product stinks in Seattle, uh, KC.  I haven’t watched a single other team’s game because, well, who cares?  I don’t do fantasy baseball because I would get fired for devoting as much time as it takes to win, and no one would pay my cable bill (or maybe Barack’s got this round).  Or I would lose, and I don’t want to do that.

*It may be your money.  My employer received about $7 billion in TARP funds from you to stay afloat, and I have no idea what we are doing with it because we are not lending it.  I should form my own bank holding company.  Then I could get TARP funds.  I would merely explain to the treasury that I squandered all of my money on watching Royals baseball and drinking Three Buck Chuck from Trader Joe’s.

No, I am truly struggling with this cost benefit analysis.  So let’s do the math, shall we?

So the MLB package cost me $170.00 back in April.  The cable company was nice enough to bill me over 4 months for this.  They were also nice enough to charge me $1.99 to “add a service”.  Awesome on both counts.  Since the Royals have won a whopping 37 games this season; I have paid $4.90 per win.  Yes, I am forfeiting a pack of cigarettes to see each of the Royals’ wins.*

*No I am not.  I am still smoking.  I just stopped paying for my dog’s heartworm medication.  Let’s hope watching John Buck stroke a double to left center will prevent deadly parasites.  It can’t hurt.

Now, obviously, the Royals will win another game.  In fact, they are on pace to win 65 of them.  That means that, come the end of the season, I will have paid $2.62 per win.  That’s better.  It’s only a draught beer at happy hour per game.  But based on what I have seen, I am not really willing to pay more than $1 per win.  What to do?

But I just noticed something interesting.  It seems that the MLB is offering the second half of the MLB package for $130.  Well, that means (and frankly I agree) that the first half of the season should have only cost me $40.  Where is the Royals rebate??  I don’t want to watch 70 more games of Yuniesky Betancourt, Bruce Chen, or Ryan Freel.  I don’t want any more Sydney Ponson, Kyle Farnsworth, or Jamon Cruzahay (that’s my hybrid term for Wright, Cruz, and Mahay).  I have to get this cost down.  So, if MLB granted me my wish, and mailed me a check for the extra $130 that I don’t really want to spend, can I get this down to under a buck per win???  Nope, at $40 for up to this point, I still paid $1.08 per win.  Crap.

I got it.  I can achieve my fiscal goals by merely getting three favors from three different entities.

  1. Major League Baseball mails me a check for $130, and
  2. Barack Obama agrees to federally subsidize my overpayment per Royals win of $2.96 ($.08 per game), and
  3. The Royals win three more games this season

Is it sad that #2 is the most realistic?  Now, where did I put my smokes?

Looking Behind To The Future

2
Filed under Kansas City Royals

As we look forward to the second half of this Royals (or as I am calling them, The Mariners East) season*, I can’t say that I am not disappointed.  It’s not that I thought the Royals were going to win the World Series.  I didn’t even think they would make the playoffs.  But I will say this; I have not lived in Kansas City since the mid-80’s.  Never before this season have I ever ponied up the money to purchase the MLB package.  And that is saying something because I pay every year for the NHL package (see Bellwether, someone watches hockey), and I even got the NBA package one season.  But I finally did it because I thought this team may actually play a meaningful game in the second half of the season.  I now know this will not happen, and it’s like getting punched in the gut once a month when I see that $50 charge on my cable bill.

 

*”look forward” may be a strong way of putting it.  It’s more like “looking forward to a colonoscopy.”

 

But I’ve realized that it is not the losses that bother me.  It’s not the way that they lose them that bothers me either.  It’s the fact that, for the most part, when someone comes up to bat, I know that they stink.  The personnel on this team are frighteningly bad.  It’s epically bad.  And then when analysts say things like, “there is nothing better in the minor league system.” I want to vomit.   So for fun this morning, I pieced together a new starting lineup from player we could have had.  By this I mean players that we already had once.  Here is what I have versus tonight’s predicted starting lineup.

 

Center Field:

Tonight – David DeJesus .256/.314/.414  7 HR 41 RBI

Could Have Been (CHB) – Carlos Beltran .336/.425/.527  8 HR 40 RBI

 

The power numbers are a little deceiving, but you know Beltran was a better fielder.   Tell me you wouldn’t make this trade straight up right now.  I dare you.

 

2nd Base:

Tonight – Alberto Callaspo .298/.352/.455  6 HR 35 RBI

CHB – Joey Gathright .000/.000/.000  0 HR 0 RBI

 

Good Lord!  We haven’t had a decent second baseman in a while.  Does anyone have mark Grudzielanek’s number handy and some Alleve?

 

1st Base:

Tonight – Billy Butler .290/.340/.449  8 HR 38 RBI

CHB – Raul Ibanez .312/.369/.669  24 HR 63 RBI

 

Obviously Butler is a good player, and should become a solid middle of the order guy.  But man did we miss the Ibanez thing.  Plus, he played in Seattle; which we LOVE…A LOT.

 

DH:

Tonight – Mike Jacobs .222/.296/.412  12 HR 30 RBI

CHB – Matt Stairs .283/.434/.517  4 HR 13 RBI

 

I haven’t liked Jacobs since he got rid of the facial hair.  Plus, I have always wanted to just sit and eat fried cheese curds with Stairs.  Just sounds like a good time.

 

3rd Base:

Tonight – Alex Gordon .095/.269/.238  1 HR 3 RBI

CHB – Mark Teahen .294/.350/.447  9 HR 29 RBI

 

I don’t know what to do here (and frankly neither do the Royals).  Is Joe Randa in the house??  Joe??

 

Right Field:

Tonight – Jose Guillen .243/.315/.376  9 HR 37 RBI

CHB – Jermaine Dye .302/.375/.567  20 HR 55 RBI

 

This just makes me ill. 

 

Left Field:

Tonight – Mark Teahen .294/.350/.447 9 HR 29 RBI

CHB – Johnny Damon .276/.362/.510 16 HR 50 RBI

 

Eh, whatever?

 

Shortstop:

Tonight – Yuniesky Betancourt.250/.278/.330 2 HR 22 RBI

CHB – Angel Berroa .136/.174/.182 0 HR 1 RBI

 

I’ll reserve judgment on this one for now.  No I won’t.  Crap!!

 

Catcher:

Tonight – Miguel Olivo .244/.267/.476  13 HR 35 RBI

CHB – John Buck .211/.294.422 3 HR 19 RBI

 

How is it that we haven’t had a decent catcher in a decade?  Shouldn’t we have lucked into one on accident or something?

 

So there you have it.  I am not guaranteeing that my “fantasy team” would beat the Rays tonight.  But I can guarantee that I wouldn’t feel the level of despair I am used to while watching Mariners East baseball.  Take it for what it’s worth.  Oh, happy 29th birthday to Joe Lachky!  This last one is for you.

 

Ross “Blow your” Gload is batting .280/.345/.416 3 HR 15 RBI this season.

Booing for Booing’s Sake

0
Filed under Kansas City Royals

Something has been irking me.  It’s not a big thing (it rarely is).  And it is certainly something that has been going on since I started watching sports.  But for some reason it’s really getting to me.  It’s to a point that, whenever I am watching and it happens, I feel the need to tell the person next to me that it irks me and why.  Often times I get nothing but blank stares from that person.  Maybe that is because it’s just not a big deal.  Maybe it’s because, most of the time, I am watching it happen from my couch, and my dog doesn’t really speak English.  But I am just about ready to run to the window, rip open the curtains*, and scream, “I AM MAD AS HELL, AND I AM NOT GOING TO TAKE IT ANYMORE!!!!”

 

*Like I actually have curtains.  That probably should have said something like, ‘bend open the cheap metal blinds that came with my apartment.’  Not nearly as dramatic, though.

 

You ready?

 

Stop booing when the opposing pitcher throws over to a base to hold a runner on.  Just stop it.  You all look like fools.  I am serious.  STOP!!!!

 

It’s a part of the game.  It’s called defense or precautionary strategy.  Put yourself in the shoes of the pitcher.  You are grossly overpaid because one year you had an ERA under 5.00, and won 11 games.  You are desperately trying to make yourself valuable to other teams so that you can get traded away from the terrible club you play for.  You are clinging to a one run lead in the 5th when you walk the lead-off guy.  You’re telling me that you are cool if he just goes to second??  Of course you’re not.   If that guy gets to second with no one out, the only way you are walking off the field in line for the win is if you are playing our beloved Royals. 

 

Even if the guy has only marginal speed (Bloomquist-esque?), he is more than likely going to be safe if he runs.  Think about it.  Yadier Molina was the starting catcher for the NL in the All Star Game, and he throws out 56% of runners.  44% of runners get to the base safely on him, and he is the best defensive catcher in the game!!!  You have to at least keep the guy honest.  And God forbid you have some crazy slow-ass pitching motion.  Hideo Nomo was so slow he could actually travel back in time from his wind up.  He’s the anti-DeLorean.  (coincidently, his fastball couldn’t actually get to 88 mph).

 

No one does this in other sports either.  When was the last time you were watching a game from Allen Fieldhouse, and heard the crowd erupt when Mizzou made their awkward white guy guard KU’s awkward white guy on an inbounds pass? 

 

Bottom line is, even here in St. Louis, where everyone claims to be the greatest and most knowledgeable baseball fans in the world, people still boo when the pitcher is holding a runner at first.   C’mon people!  Work with me!!!  Oh, and Royals fans, we just should be cheering that someone was there for the pitcher to hold.